(if so) This follows on from Q: [QTitle] if answered: [QItemShort]
[QDesc]
The answer can have [only one option|multiple options].
Required in [EnqName]
Required in [EnqName]
Considering in [EnqName]
Not asking in [EnqName] (button for) ask it!
(if unaddressed) I have not decided whether to answer this question: consider answering
(if unanswered) I have not yet answered this question: give answer
(if answered) My answer is: [MyAns]
(if muted anywhere) but this answer is muted for these enquiries:
(if refused) I have refused to answer this question at all: reconsider
Diagnostics: ?
Key: {QID}; information from {QDetails}
Setting or modifying the wants for this question in the given enquiry, while at the same time being aware of own answer status
Note that the question/wants form will be different from the Q/A form. Usually a Q/A form has radio buttons for a single answer, whereas Q/W form has check boxes for each acceptable answer.
The point here is that asking the follow-on question only makes sense in the context of a particular answer to a wider question.
I have to document some good examples.
We should show the date of origin of this question, and some way of seeing previous versions.
We will try allowing multiple answers. The person asking a required question has to choose between:
The following two conditions are logically possible, but are probably too confusing to use reliably.
It is probably better to deal with exclusions though binary questions.
The key question is, is it easy enough to define as many binary questions for all the options, or are there distinct advantages for a set being grouped together?